Global
order
MS-Nepal
Environmental objectives:
- Strengthening
of Natural Resource Base
- Reduce
MS-Nepal Pollution
- Dismantle
The Global Ecological Dis-order
General
introduction
MS Nepal has
elaborated a new policy paper 1999-2004. The policy paper is a
frame for the way MS-Nepal wants to work for the next 5 years.
This Environment strategic paper should be seen as a detailed “filling
out” the frame concerning Environmental issues.The MS-Nepal
programme, as given in the policy paper, can be presented as
follows:
MS-Nepal
Vision
- People in
Nepal are able to improve capabilities and living conditions
maintaining their natural resource base.
- Nepal
evolves into a democratic, plural, just and humane society.
- Improved
global equity, human rights, and living conditions of the
world’s poor.
MS-Nepal
Mission
- Mobilising
human and economic resources.
- Building
Partnerships and alliances.
- Facilitating
flow of information and co-operation between North and South
as well as within South.
MS-Nepal
Programme Goal
- To enable
and empower the disadvantaged and poor to improve their living
conditions.
- To
promote cultural interaction and development dialogue between
Nepal, Denmark and with the international community.
MS-Nepal
will work for the above by working within 6 Underlying Principles
- Development
by people
- Gender
- Sustainable
development
- Pluralism
- EnvironmentThe
needs of the disabled
Through
- Capacity
building
- Advocacy
MS-Nepal
Environmental objectives:
1. The
Natural Resource Base. Strengthening the natural resource base
for food, feed, and fuel production at local levels for the
satisfaction of basic needs.
2.
MS-Nepal Pollution. Reducing MS-Nepal's negative impact on the
environment through reduced consumption and pollution.
3. The
Global Ecological Dis-order. Lobbying for world order, which
is just in relation to resources and pollution. Lobbying
specifically for reduced consumption/pollution in the MS system
and in Denmark generally.
MS-Nepal
Environmental Policy and Strategy paper was approved by MS-Nepal
Policy Advisory Board (PAB) the 4th of October 1999.
1.
Strengthening the Natural Resource Base
Background
Due to the
fact that approximately 80 % of the people living in Nepal depends
on agriculture for their livelihood, MS Nepal has choosen “Strengthening
the Natural Resource Base” as one of the three environmental
issues.Subjects like erosion, decreasing agriculture productivity
etc. are so closely interelinked with the management of natural
resources, and in coherence with that, management of the agro
ecosystem. Therefore, this issues is of major concern for
satisfaction of basic needs3 for the rural population in the
future.
The mean
size of farms in Nepal approximates 0.8 ha. But due to very uneven
distribution of land 40% of agricultural landholds own farms less
than 0.4 ha in size. The primary task for these farmers must be to
secure their livelihood. Security for these farmers can be
developed through existing farming systems but with changes in
management and design. For the small farmers the “green
revolution” strategy with high yielding varieties, chemical
fertilizers and pesticides for production of crops for markets is
doubtfull. For fast short term economic gain it works, but the
results are decreasing soil fertility, dependency of new
varieties, dependency of supply of fertilizer and lower total
outcome from the farm.It might be expected that in the future
(after 50 years or more) still the main part of the population
depends on agriculture, most probably with smaller landholdings
compared to now. Most of these small farms will be subsistence
farms also in the future.The primary development task is to secure
and improve the well being of these small farmers in a sustainable
manner.
In MS-Nepal
we believe that - for the poor farmers of Nepal, who sustains on
small landholdings, and Nepal as such, steps towards highly
integrated farming systems are more benneficial and sustainable
for the farmers and will improve the environment in Nepal in
general. MS-Nepal do not encourage agriculture systems with
intensive monoculture and high external input.
The idea is
to maximise the biological productivity4 and reduce the external
input as much as possible considering a total yield that satisfy
the basic needs of the farmers. By “tuning” the agro-ecosystem
to a higher biological productivity through i.e. increased soil
fertility, the production from farms can be increased.We believe
that Nepal can be selfsufficient in food supply if the natural
resource base is strengthend.Strengthening the natural resource
baseThe basic need fulfilment of present and future generations
will depend primarily on the ability of the natural resource base
of Nepal to produce sufficient; food, fodder, fuel, fibre and
range of other products such as clay, stone and timber for houses,
herbal medicine etc. And this for a growing population. That means
enhancing the quality and strengths of the agro-ecosystems. Some
of the key areas are improved management of soil fertility, water,
seeds and other planting materials, nutrients, micro-climates etc.
and improved overall designs which integrates the various elements
of the agro-ecosystems in Nepal at the farm, local and national
levels. The present trend of soil degradation, loss of varieties,
use of dangerous chemicals, reduction in tree cover etc. must be
reversed.
In order to
do the above, and reach small farmers needs, the following is
needed:
- The
necessary planting materials (most of which is available in
Nepal).
People
with :
- Knowledge
of ecosystems and ability to analyse local agro-ecosystems
- Ability
to apply this knowledge to local agro-ecosystems
- Knowledge
of a range of species, technologies and systems relevant for
Nepal
- Skills in
those techniques and ability to demonstrate them
- Ability
to develop/adapt technologies/systems to local conditions in
co-operation with small farmers.
- Demonstrations
for farmers to see techniques, which will produce more on the
same (small) piece of land than presently used techniques.
- Support
for farmer-to-farmer extension of techniques, which have
proven valuable to (small) farmers in Nepal - e.g. transport
and training materials.
- Legislation
to ban dangerous pesticides (e.g. the dirty dozen), to save
seeds, to stop entry of GMOs etc.
MS-Nepal
will seek to promote the above activities through:
- Discussions
at Annual Partnership Reviews. Care must be taken that the
partner doesn't see the inclusion of 'the latest MS ideas' as
a precondition for a continued partnership.
- Expand
activities with partners, which already are working along the
above lines.
- In the
long term shifting towards partners, which think along similar
lines as MS-Nepal on environmental issues.
- Support
non-partnership activities such as publications, workshops,
lobbying etc.
2.
MS-Nepal Pollution
BackgroundMS-Nepal's
main destructive effect on Nature is its large CO2 emissions from
transport - car and aeroplane. It is now internationally accepted
that an increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere leads to
climate changes in the form of increasing instability and increase
in temperature. Global warming has incalculable consequences for a
large part of the earth’s population. The problems are
particular acute in developing countries due to the fact that an
unstable climate will hit developing countries particularly
hard.The emission from the worlds poor approximates 0.1
ton/person/year. For Danes the emission amounts 12 ton/person/year.Besides
the CO2 emission, MS-Nepal consumes a lot of other things and
therefore pollutes due to this consumption. 25 % of the world’s
population most of whom live in the rich countries are responsible
for 80 % of the global resource consumption. The industrialised
countries are not only the biggest consumers but also the biggest
polluters.Total global resource consumption must be reduced out of
consideration but this must occur in a way that industrialised
countries reduces their resource consumption to make possible an
increase in the developing countries.To act as a conscious
consumer and to promote an equal share of the world’s resources
MS-Nepal intends to reduce its CO2 emission and other
consumptions/pollutions.Reduction in CO2 emissionUsing the
principle of Equal Environmental Space for all people in the world
and the calculations made by IPCC (International Panel on Climate
Changes) & NOAH it is recommended to make a 55 % CO2 emission
reduction in Denmark by 2010.
According to
these recommendations MS internationally states a 30 % reduction
in the CO2 emission by 2005 and 50 % reduction by 2010.
The MS-Nepal
Policy paper (1999-2004) has chosen to reduce their CO2 emission
with 25 % by 2004 compared to 1999 emissions. In 1999 the total
CO2 emission from MS Nepal was 132,5 tons not included all
international flights. 25 % reduction by 2004 gives an average
reduction for MS-Nepal of approximately 6,6 tonnes CO2 per year.
For this
to happen we suggest the following:
A CO2 budget
must be made (starting from year 2000) which allocates emissions
to various activities in MS. The issue of international flights
between Nepal and DK is clarified with MS-Copenhagen.
MS will
establish systems for ensuring that the programme stays within its
CO2 budget.
A booklet
giving the information needed for the calculation of CO2 emissions
from various activities - professional as well as private.
MS conducts
workshops for employees at the CO, for DWs and for partners on
'Environmental Space and MS-Nepal'. These will discuss both the
historical, ethical, developmental and practical aspects.
MS-Nepal
launches a competition on '1000 Ways of Cutting CO2 emissions in
MS-Nepal'. Prices are given for the best proposals.
Other
Consumption/Pollution.An assessment of the annual flow of
commodities through MS-Nepal Country office will have to be made.
After assessment priorities and targets for reduction have to be
elaborated. It has to be decided whether CO shall assess all
commodities or just select the most obvious of these. Items could
be photocopy/laser printer toner, paper, water etc.
In
connection with transport the emission of carbon particles from
diesel engines has to be evaluated. The emission of carbon
particles is higher from diesel engines than from petrol engines
but the diesel engine is more efficient in utilising the diesel
and due to this, the CO2 emission/km is lower.
When MS
purchase new office machinery, energy efficiency and the degree of
recyclability should be taken into consideration.
3. The
Global Ecological Dis-order.Background
In coherence
with Globalisation, lobbying for world order which is just in
relation to resources and pollution is urgently needed for the
South (and the North). As the world trade becomes more liberal, it
will lead to further environmental degradation. Export of
pollution from the North to the South, patenting on life, high
consumption in the North, increased global financial speculation
are subjects that threats the environment especially in the South.
Besides, MS
should lobby for reduced consumption in Denmark as an example for
other countries in the North but also as a result of the fact,
that Denmark is one of the most consuming countries in the world.
Reducing
the Global Dis-order
MS-Nepal
wants to raise the following environmental issues, which are
global/international in nature. These global environmental issues
are chosen to raise awareness, create discussions and action among
people both in south and north.
Consumers in
the North should reduce their consumption/pollution to levels
within their environmental space.
The Danes
should reduce their consumption/pollution to levels within their
environmental space. Danes should be pioneers in this field and a
good example for other countries (cf. Danes and 1% of BNP in
Development Aid).
Consumers in
the North are responsible for the pollution which results from the
production of the products consumed- also if the production takes
place outside their own country e.g. in a country in the South.
The environmental space they take up should be calculated
accordingly. Lobbying should be targeted at 1. Denmark, 2.
Scandinavia, 3. Europe, 4. The rest of the North.
All trade in
'The Dirty Dozen' must stop.
Patenting of
life should be banned. The main concern is the appropriation of
varieties developed over long time in the South e.g. Neem, Basmati
and Jasmine rice etc. We regard the policies of Monsanto as direct
threat to farmers in the South.
International
standards on pollution control and working environment.
Regulation
of world trade and financial speculation/investment.
Pollution
should not be regulated at the outlet but at the source.
MS-Nepal
will publish materials on the above topics for partners and DWs to
read. We encourage MS-Denmark to promote the ideas nationally and
internationally.