With the abrupt failure of peace talks,
the government forces and Maoist insurgents have come face to face
once again. As the nationwide emergency is leaving behind a bloody
trail, chances of peace seem remote.
There is not a single day
without reports of casualties either on the side of security
forces or on that of the Maoist insurgents. Worse, private
citizens including children, women and elderly people are falling
victim to the six-year-old insurgency that has taken the most
violent turn as the year 2001 drew closer to the end.
People at Kafaldada
village in insurgency-hit western district of Gorkha had closed
their doors early in the evening to protect themselves from the
fall-out of intensified conflict between the security forces and
insurgents on November 17. But to no avail. A group of nearly two
dozen armed Maoist rebels entered the village all of a sudden and
hacked to death 75-year-old Surya Prasad Dawadi, a Nepali Congress
worker, and 28-year-old school teacher Shiva Prasad Adhikari. In
less than an hour, they had already fled to the safety of a nearby
forest.
On the same day, security
forces in Gorkha and Myagdi districts killed two suspected Maoist
insurgents.
An estimated 400 people
have lost their lives since the Maoist rebels unilaterally pulled
out of peace talks in November this year and resumed their
offensive against the government forces. For the first time in six
years, they targeted Royal Nepalese Army barracks and mounted
daring raids on the district headquarters of Dang, Salyan and
Solukhumbu.
In response, King
Gyanendra declared a nationwide state of emergency on Nov. 26 and
gave nod to mobilize army personnel to contain the insurgency. The
government introduced the Terrorism and Disruptive Act
(Preventive) Ordinance and declared Maoists as terrorists.
In the first three weeks
of their battle, the army has launched a massive ‘cordon and
search operation’ in different parts of the country and has taken
into custody hundreds of suspected Maoist terrorists and
supporters. Hundreds of Maoist supporters, including the
office-bearers of the local level parallel government units set up
by the Maoists, surrendered before the local administration. “The
operation is going on in an excellent way,” claimed chief of the
army staff, General Prajwalla Shumsher JB Rana, in an interview
with the state-owned Nepal Television.
On their part, Maoist
insurgents seem to have adopted a strategy to destroy
communication facilities and engage soldiers in scattered
conflicts. Dozens of them have been killed while trying to blow
off repeater stations of Nepal Telecommunications Corporation in
remote Rolpa and Salyan districts. At least four soldiers have
also been killed in the encounters.
It has become apparent now
that as Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba’s government sat idle
for four-long months (August-November 2001) hoping peace to
prevail on its own, the Maoist rebels had a field day in
re-grouping their cadres, recruiting and training new ones,
raising forced donations and taking revenge with anyone who they
thought did not toe their line. Despite severe criticism from the
opposition, the government would not take any measures to provide
law and order in the country. Instead it agreed to release 69
Maoist rebels and withdraw the Public Security Regulations only to
persuade the Maoist negotiators to sit for the third round of
talks early this month.
Government negotiators
taking part in the talks say the rebels were never serious in the
three rounds of talks that took place over the last three months.
Unlike in a peace talks, from Godavari Resort and back to the same
resort, the Maoist negotiators deliberately chose to highlight the
points of difference with the government rather than trying to
negotiate on other ‘soft issues.’ In the latest round of talks,
the Maoists said they had decided to drop their demand for making
Nepal a republic but insisted that they would not agree at
anything less than (elections to a) constituent assembly to draft
a new constitution and form an interim government. “Now the ball
is in the government’s court,” said chief Maoist negotiator
Krishna Bahadur Mahara after coming out of the third round of
talks on November 12.
Analysts say there was
asymmetry at the level of negotiators too. “While the government
side was headed by high level policymakers, the Maoist side was
represented by a lower level. It seemed that the Maoists
negotiators did not have clear guidelines and were confused,” said
Dr. Panna Kaji Amatya, professor of Political Science at the
Tribhuvan University. “The Deuba government had shown utmost
sincerity (to find a peaceful solution) but there is seen lack of
consensus and honesty on the part of the Maoists.”
The late afternoon
statement issued by top Maoist leader, Comrade Prachanda, on
November 21(2001) was no less than a bombshell for the officials.
In his statement faxed to major media organizations in the
Nepalese capital, Prachanda alias Pushpa Kamal Dahal said there
was no more justification for the four-month-old `cease-fire.’
Both the government and Maoists had agreed for an informal truce
in July this year as soon as Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba
assumed office, by replacing Girija Prasad Koirala, believed to be
a hard-liner politician within the moderate party.
In his statement,
Prachanda admitted that his party’s efforts to establish peace had
been rendered unsuccessful due to the conspiracy of the
‘imperialist and reactionary forces.’ Though he did not identify
who those forces were. The Maoist party has been describing the
USA as an imperialist force and royal palace as a reactionary one.
Saying that the Maoists would continue their struggle for a
republican system of government in the country (by replacing the
constitutional monarchy through the use of force), Comrade
Prachanda, however, said his party had not closed doors for talks
completely.
Things were not the same
only ten days back. The three-member Maoist negotiation team led
by Krishna Bahadur Mahara notified their government counterparts
that their party had decided to drop their demand for making Nepal
a republic, it could not convince the government negotiation team
about the need for forming an interim government and holding
elections to the constituent assembly—two major Maoist demands.
Emerging out of the
marathon five-hour long debate on Nov. 12, Mahara told reporters
that his party could not bow further. “The ball is now in the
government’s court,” said Mahara. Chief government negotiator,
Chiranjivi Wagle, insisted that as the Maoists had withdrawn their
demand for a republic state, their other demands could be
fulfilled within the ambit of the country’s constitution. “(We
have conveyed to them that) There is no need to go for a
constituent assembly,” he added.
The reasons behind the
Maoist leader’s statement could not be known immediately but
analysts said it could be one more ploy on the part of the
underground party to pressurize the government. Critics said it
could be the Maoist leadership’s ploy to quell the growing
dissension within its rank and file.
As the negotiations
prolonged, people at large were feeling disenchanted. The first
round of talks on August 30 had ended after fulfilling mere
formality. In the second round of talks at the Tiger Tops Resort
in the mid-western district of Bardiya in the middle of September,
the Maoist side formally put its agenda to which the government
side made initial response. The third round of talks, too, failed
to give any way out to the complex issue.
It seemed that the Maoists
were trying to be flexible while dealing with the government but
couldn’t leave behind their agenda under pressure from their
cadres. In an interview with pro-Maoist "Jana Disha" daily (that
has closed its publications after the emergency was declared),
chairman of the Maoist party Comrade Prachanda said his party had
decided to focus on the issue of elections to the constituent
assembly “to award the right to the sovereign people to decide on
the issue of (making Nepal a) republic." “Now we have to see if
the government opposes (our proposal for the elections of) the
constituent assembly under pressure from the anti-national and
fascist forces or moves ahead by taking the people into
confidence,” said the Maoist leader.
“The talks resulted into
nothing but chaos,” said Dr. Krishna Hachhethu, a political
scientist. “It seems the local commanders of the Maoists were
against the talks and it was unlikely that the Maoist leadership
would join the mainstream unless the present constitution was
amended.”
A little known outfit, the CPN (Maoist)
has emerged as a major political force in the country by employing
sheer violence by launching the so-called ‘people’s war.’ The
death of nearly 2,500 people over the last six years has left a
bloody trail behind. As the government, buoyed by international
support, is trying hard to overcome economic hardships in the
country and find resources to finance what seems going to be a
prolonged battle, the insurgents too don’t seem in a mood to give
up. As the chances of peace restoring again seem remote now, the
days ahead for Nepali people are going to be full of chaos,
confusion and pain. Perhaps, this is a price an underdeveloped
country like Nepal, sandwiched between two giant neighbours, has
had to pay before moving toward a path of peace, stability and
development.