“If only we get education,
our lives would be better,” an ex-kamaiya from Bardiya district
stated three years ago when preparatory research was done by
Backward Society Education (BASE) for the Operation a Day’s Work
(OD) project. It was the main argument used when BASE was founded
to work for the uplift of Tharus; education clearly seems to be
the pivot of life changes for many people.
In latter years, education
has gotten a focal position in development programmes all over the
world. However, supporting education as a development effort is
not as a task straightforward as it may seem. There are numerous
dilemmas to consider, as BASE Bardiya has experienced during the
past year’s preparation and initiation of the Education for
Freedom project.
Education for all or for
some?
In Nepal, as in many other countries, education has been designed
according to norms and values of the elites. In a Hindu Kingdom
like Nepal, where high caste Hindus control most of the state
apparatus, the code of conduct in the schools as well as the
content of learning are biased accordingly. Lower castes and rural
areas are underdeveloped per se as opposed to the high castes and
developed urban areas. Such dichotomies are not alluring for
children brought up on the values of earning a living by working
the land.
Whose knowledge counts?
Robert Chambers asked rhetorically in his famous book that
criticises the ‘development doers’ for imposing their own ideals
and ignoring local knowledge. BASE also asked this question when
initiating the Education for Freedom project. The school system in
Nepal has neglected the great diversity of ethnic groups,
languages and religions in its teaching. A main focus of the
Education for Freedom project is therefore to reverse and equalise
the huge discrepancies currently existing – to let teaching
reflect the area and background of the students, make it enhance
their tolerance and understanding of the many differences in their
country and ensure that hitherto excluded and marginalized
communities like ex-kamaiyas, landless and Dalits have equal
access to education.
The Education for Freedom
project
The idea and motivation for the Education for Freedom project
emanated from a campaign in 2000 leading to the abolition of the
kamaiya system. During this campaign, it became clear that the
children of the former bonded labourers needed an alternative in
order to break with their inherited exploited status. After an
intensive period of discussion, MS and BASE made a proposal to the
Danish Youth Association to get support for an education project.
The aim was to support access to and securing of free, relevant
and good quality education for ex-kamaiya and other marginalized
children. Out of three project proposals, the one submitted by
BASE and MS was selected for receiving the money collected during
a one day’s work campaign by Danish high-school students in
November 2002. The project officially started in 2003 and is
currently being implemented in 33 government schools in six
Village development committees (VDCs) and one municipality in
Bardiya district. All selected areas have a high proportion of ex-kamaiyas,
Dalits and landless people. Out of the 33 schools, only 16 get
specific formal and non-formal education support. The rest will
benefit from general support to primary schools such as trainings,
exposures, sharing of experience from model education centres,
etc.1
Education for Freedom has
been granted a large donation of almost 70 million rupees.
However, the project is more than anything else a capacity
building project. The vast majority of activities aim at
strengthening and bringing awareness to the communities and all
the different actors influencing children’s education, including
children themselves, teachers, School Management Committees (SMCs),
parents, ex-kamaiya communities, employers and parents of child
labourers. Indirectly this also implies supporting the ex-kamaiyas
in their on-going struggle for identity cards and land. The
outcome of project expenditure cannot always be seen immediately
or very concretely. The aim is to plant the seed for attitudinal
and fundamental changes in each individual, which will benefit
society on a much larger scale.
Main components of the
project
The Education for Freedom project consists of three major
components. One is model education that entails an overall vision
and ideals of free and good quality education as well as
pilot-like manifestations of these ideals in model education
centres. The vision and ideals aim at ensuring child-centred and
pedagogically sound education where local knowledge, local
influence and different languages are integrated into the teaching
to make it more relevant. Furthermore, the integration of
principles of pluralism aims at ensuring that all children –
regardless of caste, ethnicity, gender, disability or the like –
are getting equal, fair and good treatment and teaching in
schools. Teaching should be free, contextual and compulsory as the
government promises, and teachers as well as parents should be
made mutually responsible through enhanced dialogue and knowledge
about roles and responsibilities. Besides putting due emphasis on
qualitative aspects and especially on the content of the teaching
as well as the materials and methods used, BASE will also support
some physical improvements. Budget is thus allocated for building
additional as well as improving existing classrooms, toilets,
furniture or other physical necessities.
Another component
imperative to the project is community empowerment. This implies
supporting and strengthening local people, especially ex-kamaiyas
and other marginalized, for the sake of securing quality education
for them and their children. Awareness raising on rights based
educational and child-related issues as well as mobilisation for
campaigns claiming rights to education and active involvement in
School Management Committees (SMCs) and Parent-Teacher
Associations (PTA) are some of the tools BASE plans to use.
Furthermore, this project component aims at building the capacity
of communities as well as their representative bodies through
constantly updating and informing them on current official
policies and practices and their respective rights.
The third component,
cooperation/coordination, networking and alliance building, is
supportive of the other two. This component indicates the
fundamental importance of integrating the project with the
government system and multiple other actors. This project
component at integrating the project into the existing government
structures at all levels, from school/SMC/PTA through VDC and
District Education Office (DEO) to national level. BASE seeks
close cooperation with the authorities in order to create a joint
understanding and shared responsibility for successes as well as
failures. Networking and alliance building with likeminded
organisations will be part of awareness raising of the general
public and overall lobby/advocacy for improved education in Nepal
and for focusing on issues of child labour and the like. By
cooperating with government and at the same time pressuring
government in cooperation with other qualified organisations, BASE
and MS hope to ensure that the impact of the project broadens
beyond the limited population and area targeted. This third
component, and in particular the close cooperation and
coordination with government institutions, is unique to the
project.
Activities of initiation
During the past year, BASE has focussed on making a baseline study
in order to identify the main problems and to get an overall
picture of the situation of ex-kamaiyas and schools in Bardiya.
Based on this information, BASE’s committees selected the working
area – six VDCs with highest ex-kamaiya population and the
municipality with a high number of child labourers. Next step was
to make detailed surveys of schools in the project area and select
those (16) that would benefit directly from the project, i.e.
schools located close to camps of ex-kamaiyas and landless people.
As the project involves many stakeholders, BASE has put a lot of
effort into establishing working relations with all the different
levels within government, within BASE and within the communities.
Although time consuming, it is absolutely vital for the success of
the project that everyone understands the main content of the
project.
Currently, BASE has
started the implementation of initial activities such as informing
SMCs and PTAs about government education policies, developing home
link diaries for pilot testing, mobilising ex-kamaiyas and BASE
committee members to participate and to be responsible for
specific parts of the project through thematic working groups,
informing and awareness raising, through public media and meetings
and, not least, by preparing involvement of teachers and
communities for developing contextual and locally relevant
materials in Tharu language spoken by most ex-kamaiyas for the
smallest classes in the coming year. Much is to be carried out
jointly with the education authorities of the district.
Cooperating with the
government
There is a sound philosophy underpinning the decision to support
the government school system. Obviously it would be a lot easier
to build our own model school following the liberal ideals and
child-centred philosophy of our project, open it to children of
former kamaiyas and make sure that it functions as a prime
example. This, however, would most likely be yet another glorious
island in an ocean of failed education. Too many NGO projects have
made outstanding model schools with no connections to the overall
system of education. When donor support ended, so did the school.
However, making an education project that is based on existing
public schools poses a huge challenge as it entails a need to
coordinate closely and cooperate with the state authorities, who
may not be prepared to alter existing practices.
In BASE Bardiya, it has
been a challenging task to ensure linkages with the government, as
there was nowhere to turn to for help or advise on how to handle
such cooperation. From the very beginning of the project, while
designing it and formulating the project document, the DEO,
District Development Office (DDC) and the District Administration
Office have been kept informed and the DEO consulted for various
purposes.
Among the initiatives for
cooperation, we have established a Bardiya Education Advisory
Board (BEAB) with representation from BASE Bardiya, MS-Nepal and
the DEO. The purpose of the Board is to advise and monitor the
project. It is a way to ensure joint influence, joint
responsibility and trust between the stakeholders. Outside BEAB,
but of importance to the local support and ownership of the
project, are the VDCs. BASE called all six project VDC
representatives for an information and sharing meeting about the
project in their areas with the aim to involve them and to respect
their rightful role in the project, for example as local resource
mobilisers. For sustainability, we have to work with the existing
structures and seek to influence them positively.
Symbolically of
considerable importance, the DEO took part in the ceremony when
country director of MS-Nepal, Nina Ellinger, and president of BASE
Bardiya, Bishnu Tharu, signed the official project agreement.
During the planning of the project activities, BASE also invited
DEO representatives for consultancy and to ensure timely
coordination.
The DEO is planning a
five-year District Education Plan (DEP) in cooperation with
several NGOs, among them BASE. The Ministry of Education (MOE) has
selected Bardiya as one of five districts for training and for
bottom-up planning in education. The Education for Freedom project
will be integrated into these new developments. A main task
identified by the DEO is the problem of not-going, as well as
under- and over-aged school children.
Besides cooperative planning and meetings, a first concrete task
of cooperation and synergetic use of resources between BASE and
the government was developing school profiles: a systematic
collection of quantitative and qualitative data about each school,
the area in which it is located, its students, parents, teachers,
etc. BASE was to use these profiles for selection of schools to
benefit from the project and potentially to develop into model
education centres. Some schools have already been supported by the
DEO in collecting information and in formulating visions and goals
for the coming five years.
The art of compromising
Although cooperating with government is inevitable for improving
the education system, it is not easy. After one District Education
Officer acquires in-depth knowledge of the project, he gets
transferred and we start all over again. Furthermore, BASE faces a
lot of delay when working with the government education system.
The DEO in Bardiya can hardly make any decision without consulting
first the regional office in Surkhet and thereafter the Department
of Education (DOE)/Ministry of Education (MOE). It is at times
very frustrating when our education project has planning and
deadlines to follow. BASE has to compromise sometimes. Cooperation
entails listening to and incorporating the ideas and views of the
authorities.
We are dissatisfied with
the current system, we want to change it, but we also want the
government to take part in and be responsible for the changes. It
is therefore of utmost importance to be able to compromise or even
let go of some aspects of the project that we deem really
important.
Besides cooperating and
coordinating, BASE has to advocate for changes in government rules
and practices. It was quite shocking to realise that in all the
schools where BASE field-staff went to find out about fulfilment
of and adherence to the government plan of ‘Education for All’,
the teachers had not heard of it. Hence, advocacy is continuously
needed. Although we cooperate, it does not imply that we should be
afraid of criticising weak points and flawed practices.
Another point of
controversy is support of the ex-kamaiyas whom the government
still has not approved as such. BASE advocates distributing land
and identity cards to all former kamaiyas, since all those who are
still not approved live highly insecure lives. For the children,
this means they cannot have any schooling unless their camp is
near a village with a school. BASE urges the DEO to provide
education for all these children as soon as possible, but as long
as the camps are illegal, this is not possible under government
rules. Hence, BASE advocates a compromise where we contribute some
temporary structures (for example tents) and the DEO allocates
resources for a three-year flexible schooling programme after
which the children can be enrolled in a general primary school.
Hopefully, by that time, the ex-kamaiyas will have been granted
land and a permanent school can be opened.
The struggles are worth it
Some of the most important lessons learned at BASE Bardiya relate
to our own capacities. Initially, we were not sufficiently
equipped with knowledge and suitable capacities to actually handle
such a large, diverse task. This has served to delay the
implementation because actual understanding of the project was not
broadly shared within the organisation. Much time has been spent
on sharing, informing and discussing. Everyone gets really
frustrated once in a while when coordination or communication
fails and we feel we spend all our time working on specificities
that seem far away from the schooling of children. However, the
thrill and fun of working when it succeeds makes it worth it.
There is risk of failure,
but we are ready to face the challenge – after all, the most
important thing is that all children born of ex-kamaiyas and other
marginalized people should have education and the possibilities to
make choices in their lives.
Birgitte Lind Petersen is
information and documentation advisor for BASE Bardiya
Back to Contents