| EkChhin
:
MS-Nepal Newsletter 2003 Issue
2 |
|
The
Question of Perspective in Dalit Liberation
-M.L. Nepali
Principle:
The state is an organization of classes. Whichever class or
community establishes its domination over the state will safeguard
its own rule, its wealth and its full authority. All other classes
and forces will be given only secondary importance.
The thrust of this
principle has inflicted itself most severely in Nepalese society
on the Dalits. Those who held the reins of government in Nepal did
not oppose the communal system characterized by its practice of
untouchability. Political forces have used the eradication of
untouchability as a slogan for grabbing power or winning
elections. But once power is won one does not see any concrete
scheme being brought in for improving the lot of the Dalits who
have lived for ages under the yoke of untouchability, or for
bringing change to an unjust society. The country code of 1910
Bikram Era, which was based on the Manusmiriti (a system that
gives importance to birth and not to deeds), was not discarded by
the revolution of 2007. Nor was it discarded by the constitution
of 2015 or the majority government of the Nepali Congress party
that followed. The new country code of Bhadra 1, 2020 announced
the end of untouchability, but this was not backed up by any
sanctions. The law did not spell out the punishment or fine to be
imposed on those practicing untouchability. For some 30 years such
practice remained un-punishable under the law. It took the
constitution of 2047 which came after the restoration of democracy
to announce sanctions against anyone practicing untouchability.
Under provision 10A of the new country code as amended by the
constitution, anyone guilty of the practice of untouchability is
liable to one year in jail and Rs. 3,000 in fine. Yet for 13 years
after the return of democracy the state has not shown any instance
anywhere of a clear application of this law which is of its own
making.
The above are just some
examples. There numerous incidents of the Dalits languishing in
the clutches of injustice. The ruling classes want to leave the
exploitative processes of untouchability untouched so as to ensure
that their own rule is stable, secure and peaceful. Nepal’s
unequal social structure is conducive to exploitation. The regime
does not want to contemplate changing this. It is easier to rule a
society divided into various classes and caste interests. The
reactionary ruling class will never of its own free will want to
be alienated from its authority. When something is developed the
seeds of its own disintegration emerge as soon as its dynamism and
speed are impeded. In the development of society also, a rebellion
will be born if the people are unable to meet their basic needs
and demands. The narrow thinking of the ruling class, its backward
looking ways that prevent it from changing with the changing
realities, stand in the way of speedy change in society. This
immutable shape of exploitation and oppression will give rise to a
massive uprising against the ruling dispensation. Rebellion will
subsequently emerge as a right in itself. Rebellion which alone
can right a thousand wrongs will find pride of place in the hearts
of the poor, suffering, oppressed, Dalit community. It is in this
fashion that one can see society undergoing transformation. Let us
turn now briefly to the material and mental situation of the
Dalits.
As the Dalits are
uneducated, they are given short shrift. Because of their poverty
they are subject to rampant exploitation, untouchability sees to
it that they are boycotted and looked down upon, and as they are
outside the ruling circles they remain voiceless and powerless.
Unable to organize, they are gotten the better of in everything.
Let us see what the thinking of the Dalit organizations is about
changing these realities.
1. Dependency politics:
One thinks in terms of following and currying favor with kings and
rulers to become a member of parliament, a government minister. If
one looks to another and stands alone, one has no basis in the
people.
2. Fraternal organizations
of political party: The Dalits
have been associated to some degree or other with the fraternal
organizations of all the political parties. The Dalits, as loyal
followers of the political parties through their fraternal
organizations and as stepping stones for elections, only succeeded
in rendering service to the parties. They carry the bags for the
party, they carry the chairs and hold the ladder, pay levies and
taxes, mobilize people for public gatherings and functions, and
make sacrifices for the sake of the party. But they are never
allowed in where the decisions are made. During the 13 year
history of the restored democracy, there have been five members of
the upper house and one vice chairman from the Dalit community.
For the Dalits there has been nothing noteworthy other than this.
3. Project-oriented NGO’s:
Some NGO’s working among the Dalits, instead of fostering a spirit
of revolt against the injustice of untouchability, tend to go for
projects in goat keeping, improved pig breeding, adult literacy
and programs implemented through consumer groups, beneficiary
groups and community based organizations, and then leave after a
year or two.
NGO (revolution-oriented)
The Dalits also have
organizations that advance the Dalit movement by building up
entities that work to make people aware and producing active
workers, and that work closely with the Dalit oppressed. Such
organizations have promoted Dalit rights, and with their clarity
of thought and high spirits they have struggled and brought change
in society. Some Dalit organizations with an inclination towards
agitation are now advancing with courage and audacity towards a
showdown with cruel and unjust social customs including that of
untouchability. Let us now turn for a while towards an analysis of
how international non-government organizations, foreign donor
agencies, and the ruling and other political parties look at the
Dalits and how they behave towards them.
1.
INGOs have worked closely with people of the oppressed classes,
Dalits, the poor and ethnic groups to a greater or lesser degree
in all the geographical areas. They can be seen extending their
cooperation to the poor and those with no opportunities, but they
are not to be found infusing self-confidence into long term
approaches and partner organisations that can bring true
liberation to the Dalits. What is to be found is a tendency on the
part of INGOs to make use of and experiment with the programs they
provide, then abandon their partner organizations and phase
themselves out, leaving the Dalit liberation movement uncompleted.
At the same time the conduct of the INGOs makes one feel that they
work not out of empathy but out of sympathy. In working with the
Dalits the INGOs seem to want a trickle down effect in social
change rather than a surging flood. The theory of change they
apparently prefer is one that does not upset the social apple
cart, does not throw up any obstacles or challenges, and allows
for the INGOs to continue their work over the long term without,
however, producing any real gain.
2.
Donor organizations contribute some 33 percent to the annual
budget of His Majesty’s Government. But they do not contribute
even one percent of their total budget to help the Dalits who
comprise 20 percent of the population. Nor is it stipulated
anywhere in loan and grant agreements with the government that a
certain percentage of the monies involved should be used for the
wellbeing of the Dalits. The good news is that CCO Canada, Danida
HUGOU, USAID and some other donor organizations now extend their
help to the Dalits directly. What is urgently needed is for the
donor community to work for the Dalits under a 20 year long term
scheme which provides for direct access for the Dalits to
education, governance and means and resources.
3.
In order to bring the Dalits into the mainstream of development,
the parliamentary political parties and the government should do
away with the old and unjust mainstream and open up a smoother way
for the Dalits. There is transformation taking place now on the
social plane. Society is passing through wide-ranging conflict
between Maoists and government, which has already resulted in the
death of more than 7000 Nepalese. Why has such a grave and
critical situation come about? It is mandatory for the political
parties and the government to ponder seriously what kind of
thinking, what kind of force and conduct are required to restore
things to peace, and work to convert the current peace talks into
lasting peace. What is clear to us is that if the state of
exploitation, injustice and oppression which has now established
itself in society does not change, it will itself give rise to
revolt against injustice. The Dalits, the ethnic communities,
women and the Madeshi remain under the sway of these higher castes
and classes. The voice of the entire oppressed people has gone
unheard. That is why this force which has been subjected to
injustice has now broken out of the inertia of an unjust set up
and joined up with forward looking forces. If the present regime
and the political parties fail to understand this reality and do
not change with the times, there is no way they can last.
4. Analysis of Maoist
thinking about the Dalits: In a
class society class conflict will take place. But the slogan that
caste liberation will come only after class liberation cannot
bring fundamental caste liberation. In China Mao had to launch a
proletarian cultural revolution l7 years after the original
revolution. This is proof that caste liberation cannot take place
automatically through class liberation. If caste untouchability
which is associated with Brahminism and feudalism is to be
eradicated, class struggle should go hand in hand with total war,
and class liberation and caste liberation should also go hand in
hand.
I have a little question
to ask of my Maoist friends. Why have they not given women and the
Dalits a participatory role in the peace talks? We accept the
logic that the main thing in the talks is not the presence or
absence of any particular community, but whether or not anything
is done for that community. But we do know that the Dalits as a
proletariat class have been involved in the class war. About a
thousand Dalits attained martyrdom. Could not one noble and
talented soul among the Dalit protagonists of the sacrifice and
commitment propounded by you have been chosen from the Dalits for
participation in the talks? What key role have Dalit fighters not
played in further weakening the hold of the exploiting class? What
are your views about this? Physical presence or representation at
the talks is not the main issue. But it would have been natural
for the Dalit militants, immersed in the thoughts of the oppressed
about liberation, to make great inroads into the minimal levels of
awareness that exist at a national level, quite apart from
safeguarding the rights and interests of the Dalits themselves.
5. Conclusion:
Caste untouchability, the social face of the feudal regime, grew
and expanded from the local level into a central presence. It is
the conflict built into this structure that is the main aim of
Dalit liberation. That is why it is necessary to rise above
politics and ideology to make the struggle against caste
untouchability the main agenda, link up the fight against poverty
with the struggle against untouchability, and develop the thinking
of Dalit liberation through the imparting of knowledge, education
and awareness to the Dalits themselves. Untouchability will not
end through changes in government or a change in the system alone.
Transforming an unjust society and bringing about the
participation of the Dalits in governance constitute the main
thrust of Dalit liberation.
Back to Contents
|