|
Conflict Theatre in Your Village! |
|
Moving and experimenting:
The Training Process
Most of the “actors”
in the Kachahari theater groups have never acted before. They are
grass-roots activists from the communities where their drama will
be shown. As part of the project, they received a 10-day initial
theater training. After this the groups went on tour in their own
communities, putting on performances and gathering experience with
the method. After this, the groups gathered again for 6-day follow
up where they reflected together on their work.
All in all, there
were 26 participants, nine of them women, from
five partner
organizations. The training was
conducted with the help of Nepali theatre experts in a very
participatory manner.
The actual training
in theatre began with the facilitators/trainer familiarizing the
participants with the history and theoretical aspects of village
theatre on the first day and a couple of hours' of participatory
discussions on various kinds of conflicts prevalent in the
communities and the causes and resolution of such conflicts on the
second day. Besides discussions, group works, practical exercises
and rehearsals at the training hall, the participants were asked
to go out to the town or wherever they liked in the vicinity of
the venue in Banepa, a beautiful township on the outskirts of
Kathmandu valley, find real conflicts and present them in the form
of a drama back in the training hall. They found some good real
conflict stories, one of them in the hotel itself, where they were staying during the
training period. A village theatre on the hotel conflict was
presented before an audience of the hotel owner, employees, some
guests from outside and the participants one evening. It was a
real success.
Training with a
Difference
The participants
found the Kachahari theatre training quite different from other
training program they have attended so far. Each participant had
an active role to play. Unlike in other training program the
participants were involved in warm up physical exercises, little
bit of yoga, voice exercise and different games every morning
before the actual training program began to help them remain fresh
and energetic mentally and physically.
They were divided
into five groups and each group was given the responsibility of
preparing turn by turn a daily report and presenting it the next
day, and producing a wall newspaper every day. Since the wall
newspapers contained a variety of materials including the ones
relating to the training program itself, personal impressions,
comments mostly in lighter vein and mild satires, it generated lot
of curiosity and all the participants anxiously waited for the
wallpaper to come out in the morning.
The way the training
was conducted helped the participants keep themselves busy doing
one or the other creative thing, demonstrating their talents and
interacting among each other. The training method and all
activities done during the training were also essential for team
building, and helping the participants to overcome inhibitions and
enable them to open their hearts to each other. This was quite
important because they were supposed to bring to light the
conflicts they are faced with at personal as well as at community
level, discuss the ways to use such conflicts positively, conceive
a drama to expose the contributory factors behind such conflicts
and deliberate on how best community people can be involved in
discussions on the issues of their rights, conflicts they are
facing and ways to secure peaceful social change.
Overcoming Inhibitions
|
“The nonviolent approach does
not immediately change the heart of the oppressor. It first
does something to the hearts and souls of those committed to
it. It gives them new self-respect; it calls up resources of
strength and courage that they did not they had. Finally it
reaches the opponent and so stirs his conscience that
reconciliation becomes a reality.”
- Martin Luther King, Jr. |
In the beginning the
participants came up with somewhat vague issues. They seemed
reluctant or unable to go deep into and share/discuss what kinds
of conflicts they are actually facing in their respective
communities. Some participants were defensive. Their experiences
with oppression were personal and painful. They had learned that
telling their own stories could lead people to look down upon
them. It took quite some time to help them overcome such
inhibitions. But gradually they started looking into themselves
and giving vent to even their personal feelings in relation to a
variety of unique examples of conflicts. Such honest expressions
made the theater original, lively and transformative.
The participants
confronted each other throughout the training. But most of all
they confronted themselves through the theater they were creating.
In scenes showing police stations, teashops and landlords houses,
they attempted to express the kind of oppression they felt and saw
around them. Putting it on a stage forced the activists to
reconsider what these conflicts actually looked like from
different sides. They began to ask new questions through their
stories: How do people show power and subservience in their daily
life? What stops people from resisting oppression openly? How do
people respond to power in safer ways?
By the time the
training concluded and the participants were about to go perform
in their respective villages they looked confident, enthused and
more self-aware. Ten days of staying together, working together
and getting close to each other, however, made many of the
participants and even facilitators cry at the time of departure.
< Previous | Contents |
Next >
|